I am also impressed by your review of the Game A/Game B discussion. And I too made a similar remark on the game-b site thanking Cadell for his clear and transparent contributions: https://www.game-b.org/posts/20470204
As an engineer by education and a digital citizen I do not resonate with the philosophy the panel was referring to. Therefore I much appreciate Cadell Last who at least explained their readings of Nietzsche and Hegel. Cadell also made a written "transcript" of their critique at https://philosophyportal.substack.com/p/game-ab which helps a lot for us non-intellectuals. I will certainly like to learn more about "dialectical thinking" https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZpRs2zXm-VcNEaBcUCFj3KoI7wJ7unbU to understand better why A=B is better than A vs B.
Daniel Garner, are you a human being?! As always, you are a master at bringing together so many different points of view, and nesting all of your points with in-depth recognition. Thanks for this article, good sir!
I am also impressed by your review of the Game A/Game B discussion. And I too made a similar remark on the game-b site thanking Cadell for his clear and transparent contributions: https://www.game-b.org/posts/20470204
As an engineer by education and a digital citizen I do not resonate with the philosophy the panel was referring to. Therefore I much appreciate Cadell Last who at least explained their readings of Nietzsche and Hegel. Cadell also made a written "transcript" of their critique at https://philosophyportal.substack.com/p/game-ab which helps a lot for us non-intellectuals. I will certainly like to learn more about "dialectical thinking" https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZpRs2zXm-VcNEaBcUCFj3KoI7wJ7unbU to understand better why A=B is better than A vs B.
Daniel Garner, are you a human being?! As always, you are a master at bringing together so many different points of view, and nesting all of your points with in-depth recognition. Thanks for this article, good sir!