Mmm, I’ll complain, the lecture is not of sharing opinions, so it is absolutely correct. But to break any polarity a conversation is required to share opinions.
What is missing is to question the preacher of his absolutes and semantics.
I stopped upon the A and B. Why is the world bipolar?
The heart was never symmetrical nor of a middle.
The mind was never of one half, nor the other, they are in constant tension, as I flip back to the why of two half’s of a brain, to ignore the chatter and begin the sculpture.
Mmm, I’ll complain, the lecture is not of sharing opinions, so it is absolutely correct. But to break any polarity a conversation is required to share opinions.
What is missing is to question the preacher of his absolutes and semantics.
I stopped upon the A and B. Why is the world bipolar?
The heart was never symmetrical nor of a middle.
The mind was never of one half, nor the other, they are in constant tension, as I flip back to the why of two half’s of a brain, to ignore the chatter and begin the sculpture.